Political scientist: It`s no use locking the stable door,and the proposals for constitutional reforms are an attempt at a civilized transfer of power in Belarus
Political scientist: It`s no use locking the stable door,and the proposals for constitutional reforms are an attempt at a civilized transfer of power in Belarus
ArmInfo. Director of the Caucasus Institute, political scientist Alexander Iskandaryan is convinced that what is happening in Belarus today is very similar to what is called zugzwang in chess, that is, no matter what step is ...
ArmInfo. Director of the Caucasus Institute, political scientist Alexander Iskandaryan is convinced that what is happening in Belarus today is very similar to what is called zugzwang in chess, that is, no matter what step is
taken, it will only get worse.
According to the expert, Belarus is on the verge of serious changes,
and regardless of who will be in power in the future - the incumbent
President Alexander Lukashenko will somehow be able to hold on to, or
someone else will come - the country will be greatly weakened and
will pass through turbulence.
At the same time, he believes that the next 2-3 days will be decisive
for the future of the country, since the situation has become stable,
and in the coming days it will become clear in what direction events
will develop, however, in any scenario, turbulence cannot be avoided.
At the same time, Iskandaryan believes that <It's no use locking the
stable door after the horse has bolted>, and the proposals for
constitutional reforms are belated, and rather are an attempt at a
civilized transfer of power. The political scientist did not rule out
that these proposals are an attempt to gain time and try to stabilize
the situation in the country. However, according to him, apparently,
this will be difficult to achieve, due to the scarcity of resources
at the current head of state.
"In principle, Lukashenko, as a person, as an individual is quite
militant and stable. There were many cases in his political biography
when it was hard for him. But these difficulties were more in foreign
policy, not in domestic, and he has an image of a person, who doesn't
like to give up," the political scientist said.
Referring to Lukashenko's call to Moscow, the expert reminded that
drowning people are known to grab at straws. Iskandaryan stated that
relations with Putin have been developing very difficult lately, and
Moscow was waiting for these elections in Belarus.
"It was clear to Moscow that Mr. Lukashenko would come out of these
elections weakened and if he succeeded and if the elections were
successful for him, they would start talking to him.
But, then, everything changed, since Lukashenko began playing the
anti-Russian card before the elections. It is obvious that
Lukashenko is trying to get out of this situation, and Russia is just
waiting for what will happen," the political scientist said, while
expressing his conviction that today the Kremlin has no way to keep
Lukashenko in power, which does not mean that the Belarusian leader
cannot keep power himself.
The expert also considers the talk about the introduction of Russian
troops into Belarus to be frivolous, and if this happens, it will be
the second Ukraine.
At the same time, Iskandaryan believes that neither Russia nor the
West are capable of doing anything to save Lukashenko today, since it
is impossible to do it from the outside, it is another matter if it
happens from within. He also believes that Russia will benefit from a
weak Belarus.
According to Iskandaryan, the West will not solve Belarus' problems
in the future, since these are multibillion-dollar subsidies, and the
threat of sanctions is just a "shaking of the air."
"Belarus miraculously managed to preserve the social and economic
type of state that was under the Soviet Union. It prolonged it, and
in an amazing way preserved it, unlike oil countries, which were able
to soften the economy through high oil prices. This situation has
come to an end, and is one of the most important reasons for what is
happening in Belarus today," he said. In this context, the political
scientist recalled that in 2018 such a good revolution also took
place in Armenia, such good people came to power, and democracy, but
where are tens of billions of investments? The same will happen in
Belarus, but the problems will have to be solved, and these will be
primarily social problems.
Speaking about the impact of the situation in Belarus on the
configuration within the Eurasian Economic Union, Iskandaryan noted
that there are problems in the EAEU without it. "There are problems
in the EAEU, and this is not related to Belarus. If we look at the
EAEU of the era of coronavirus, everything will become obvious. But
if we talk about Belarus, then we need to understand that the EAEU is
not a way of bilateral interaction of states - it is a way of
centering the policies of all of these countries on Russia. There are
different axes: Minsk-Moscow-Yerevan, Nursultan-Moscow-Bishkek, etc.
The axes are different; we all have different needs and sizes,
different issues of concern. I do not think that the Armenians had
great interests with the Belarusians, therefore, I believe that it
will remain as it was. The EAEU will remain for Armenia, as for the
rest of the EAEU members, a form of loyalty to the Russian
Federation. I think for Belarus too," the political scientist said.
At the same time, he is convinced that there can be no serious
anti-Russian sentiments in Belarus, and there is no point in
canceling the EAEU or the Union State.
At the same time, Inskandaryan believes that it is impossible to draw
parallels between what is happening in Belarus today, with what the
world observed two years ago in Armenia. The political scientist
stated that protests still have no leader in Belarus. Tikhonovskaya
is not a paramilitary leader, while information support is provided
in a very centralized, literate manner. According to political
scientists, the regime in Belarus, which is located in the center of
Europe between Poland and Lithuania, is archaic. And protest in
Belarus is not so much social as aesthetic. "People who were born and
raised in this country, these 30-year-old "IT specialists" have seen
nothing but Lukashenko in their lives, and the tired from this
aesthetics of the Soviet collective farm and they rise up against
it," Iskandaryan noted that this is the problem, not the 26-year
rule. It's just that the rulers have such a property that if they
stay too long at their posts, then they lose the feeling of reality
and connection with the outside world.
To note, massive opposition protests began throughout Belarus on
August 9, after the presidential election, which was won by the
incumbent head of state Alexander Lukashenko - according to the CEC,
he gained 80.1% of the vote. In the first days, the security forces
suppressed the actions; against the protesters who did not agree with
the results, they used tear gas, water cannons, flash-noise grenades,
rubber bullets. Then the law enforcement agencies stopped dispersing
the rallies and using force. According to official data, over 6,700
people were detained in the first days. As reported by the Ministry
of Internal Affairs of the republic, during the riots, hundreds of
people were injured, among them over 120 law enforcement officers,
one protester was killed.